News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 JSF noise blame game 

JSF noise blame game

28 Apr, 2010 10:58 AM
PORT Stephens Council says criticism it has copped over the impact of RAAF aircraft noise maps is "patently unfair."

The council's head planner David Broyd told the Examiner the maps relating to the introduction of the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) aircraft to RAAF Williamtown were released by Defence without any prior consultation with the council.

The council has been criticised for being too rigid in applying the maps when considering housing development.

On Tuesday night councillors held a confidential meeting to discuss a new policy guiding how it might approve homes in noise areas without hitting homeowners too hard with noise attenuation measures.

Mr Broyd said the RAAF maps triggered an immediate, legal obligation on the council to enforce the new noise contours as per Australian planning standards.

He also said repeated requests to meet with federal Defence Minister John Faulkner to discuss the maps and compensation for residents had been unsuccessful.

A meeting with the parliamentary secretary for Defence Mike Kelly has now been scheduled for May 9.

Residents have also suggested that the council could still legally approve development in noise-affected areas by simply including noise warnings on zoning and construction certificates.

But Mr Broyd said it was not that easy.

"That was done from the time the RAAF brought in the new maps in October," he said.

"There is a duty of care on the council, not just to protect the current owners and the noise impact on the them, but the future owners of that property as well.

"The bottom line for council is protecting these residents for health reasons."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
OH!!! The blame game continues how tired we all are of Council blaming Defence when it is Council that enforces their strict rules on their rate payers living in these contour zones. As Tim Thomas wrote 22/4/10 the Council has the power to be flexible in how it deals with this issue and there are clear and simple ways that it can protect itself from litigation. However the residents will not agree to acoustically insulate a $100,000 home when it will cost an extra $150,000 to insulate it. Come on DB get on with helping the rate payers and stop feeling sorry for yourself!!
Posted by Public Supporter, 28/04/2010 7:20:19 PM, on The Port Stephens Examiner
There is a lot of comment on the noise level with the JSF. However, all the comment seems to revlove around VACANT land and its improvement. Has/is anyone giving any thought to those who presently live in areas which are outside the contours and which will become affected by the new contours? What, if any compensation will be forthcoming for us existing homeowners? Will the P/S council or RAAF pay for retrofitting of insulation etc. to comply with the building regs. or will we have to suffer with the extra noise? Surely, the council or more probably, the Federal government/RAAF must be held responsible for this increase in Noise. We, the existing residents purchased our properties with the present noiselevel in mind. we ween't made aware of the JSF and its increased noise levels!
Posted by mike, 29/04/2010 12:12:21 PM, on The Port Stephens Examiner
It's curious that the council is suddenly being super cautious over this issue when their planning decisions in past years have been questionable to say the least. It could be that they are worried about being sued again. Or maybe this issue is the perfect chance for them to wave the flag and say it's not their fault (this time).
Posted by Emma, 30/04/2010 11:32:20 AM, on The Port Stephens Examiner
We ratepayers at Port Stephens are making the JSF mistake, interest rates rising land worthless, homes virtually unsellable. Mums and Dads with mortgages worth a lot more now than their homes are worth not to mention House Insurance problems. Council don't own us and should act in a manner that we put them there to do, protect our best interests. So why are they so hostile towards thousands of affected ANEF 2025 ratepayers. Are they going to reduce our rates, are State Government going to suspend Land Taxes for worthless vacant land. Will high noise areas like Tanilba Bay, Mallabulla and Lemon Tree Passage be next to be affected. It would be in everyones best interests if Councillors showed some courage and sacked a few Council Administrators who seem to be a stumbling block to fixing this issue.
Posted by Robbed, 4/05/2010 8:55:46 PM, on The Port Stephens Examiner

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles




Port Stephens Examiner







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...