News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 RAAF backing Port Stephens Council over noise decision 

RAAF backing Port Stephens Council over noise decision

10 Mar, 2010 10:37 AM
THE RAAF has backed a Port Stephens Council decision to approve a Medowie home without the need for insulation against aircraft noise.

"I think that was actually a good result," the deputy chief of the air force, Air Vice-Marshall Geoff Brown told the Examiner in an interview this week.

Port Stephens councillors went against advice from planning staff, voting at its March 2 meeting to support the development of a home in Boyd Boulevard, Medowie, without the need for sound proofing.

This was despite the site for the home being classified as noise affected by the Department of Defence's noise exposure forecasts for the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) aircraft, scheduled to arrive at Williamtown in 2017.

But Air Vice-Marshall Brown admitted the noise exposure contours designed for the JSF were based on an "imperfect system" and the council should determine development applications (DAs) on noise-affected land based on their individual merits.

"The lines are lines, but the real effect on the ground will not be that great...it was the best we could do with the current system," he said.

"We are tied to a standard for producing noise exposure forecasts.

"We measured the real noise affects the best we could…I'm hard-pressed to see what else we could do."

A draft public environment report into the introduction of the JSF says noise insulation is not warranted, would be of minimal benefit and its cost is not justified.

But advice from the council's lawyers states that it would be legally exposed if it did not apply relevant Australian standards.

Air Vice-Marshall Brown said the prospect of future legal action was something the council would have to weigh up when it determined DAs on a merit basis.

He also said the Salt Ash Weapons Range would remain open but the JSF's use of it would be about a third of current aircraft.

Many see this as a reason to reduce exposure contours covering nearby areas such as Medowie.

But Air Vice-Marshall Brown reiterated the fact that Defence was tied to a standard for producing noise forecasts and that the current contours were the outcome of applying that standard accurately.

He also expressed concern over reports that not enough had been done to work with the council on the introduction of the new noise data.

"We held three workshops and a number teleconferences on this before hand," he said

He said he did not believe there were grounds for a class action against Defence, by those who believed the value of their land would be reduced by the introduction of the JSF, or would be forced to spend money on their homes to reduce noise.

Port Stephens councillor Steve Tucker briefly raised the issue of a class action at a recent council meeting.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


No comments yet. Be the first to comment below.

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
SYSTEM: The noise exposure forecasts may be imperfect but are the best available says Air Vice-Marshall Geoff Brown.
SYSTEM: The noise exposure forecasts may be imperfect but are the best available says Air Vice-Marshall Geoff Brown.

Most popular articles




Port Stephens Examiner







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...