News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Runway plan music to Ears 500 at meeting 

Runway plan music to Ears 500 at meeting

30 Jun, 2010 12:00 AM
ANGER and confusion surrounding the roll out of the RAAFs new Joint Strike Fighter continues to grow with a new Raymond Terrace residents group attracting more than 500 people at its first meeting.

The large group last week packed Raymond Terrace Bowling Club to hear a $70 million plan to minimise the impact of noise from the incoming Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) aircraft.

Dubbed Safe Ears, an acronym for "save Aussie families' ears - extend airport runway south-east", the group was set up to advocate a 2.5-kilometre extension of the runway at RAAF Base Williamtown on government-owned land.

The group says this would effectively minimise the noise impact on the Port's residential areas.

Raymond Terrace property planner Paul Le Mottee convened the meeting and said attendees were encouraged to write directly to new Prime Minister Julia Gillard.

"It's all very well having a whinge, but you've got to have an answer as well, and we have," he said.

"We want people to send their letters to the Prime Minister saying the community urgently wants to meet with you."

At an estimated cost of $70 million to the federal government, it is likely the proposed extension would require Nelson Bay Road and Medowie Road to be dug under the new part of the runway.

The cost estimate and plan was provided by former RAAF commander of base support and Medowie Progress Association president John Donahoo. Mr Le Mottee said even if the cost blew out to $100 million, it remained a small number compared to both the amount being spent on the JSF program and the bill footed by the community as a result of diminished land values.

Parliamentary secretary for Defence Mike Kelly told Port Stephens Council last month he would consider the viability of extending the runway but acting manager of sustainable planning Bruce Petersen said he had not heard anything further on the subject from Defence.

At the Safe Ears meeting residents voted almost unanimously that the RAAF should remain part of the Port Stephens community.

A steering committee was formed and a petition circulated on the night.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Getting a longer runway for the council payed by the government ,dont you have to stop and think that it could be a hidden agenda to bring in civilian International flights of 747 aircraft in the future . That would be good for every ones ears when they are flying low in the circuit . I will have the RAAF any day than have to listen to a 747 screaming and poluting my water supply with exhaust fall out .
Posted by Eyes Open, 2/07/2010 6:26:04 PM, on The Port Stephens Examiner
Extending the runway will not solve the noise problem of the aircraft using Salt Ash Weapons Range. Bigger aircraft need a wider sweep. RAAF promises and maps mean nothing as they are based on inaccurate data and predictions. How will you prevent Nelson Bay Road from flooding if you put it under a runway?
Posted by daisy, 2/07/2010 10:08:45 PM, on The Port Stephens Examiner
A lot of promises were made when the RAAF introduced the Hornet to the area. Most of which have never been implymented. Have any of the schools been fully insulated against the current noise? Do the jets stop flying when school exams are in progress? How may compensation claim have been knock back? Has the PSC established a panel to consider claims for compensation for those persons adversely affected by aircraft noise? Is there any air quality readings currently being undertaken in the communities? Has the ammunition fall outs been cleaned up? Is this still polluting the water of the Tomeree Aquifer? Has the water treatment plant at the Base been updated? Is industrial wastes still threatening the groundwater aquifer & what measures have been taken to prevent pollution of the aquifer and drainage systems? Where are the reports from the Commonwealth on the monitoring of the quality of groundwater in the aquifer? Are solid & liquid wastes of a polluting nature still stored at the Base? Has noise impacts in residential areas been reduced? Has a health study been undertaken on the effects of aircraft noise on residents under the low flying flight paths?
Posted by saltashlady, 4/07/2010 10:43:37 AM, on The Port Stephens Examiner

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles




Port Stephens Examiner







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...