PORT Stephens Council could lose "untold millions" in developer contributions if "prime residential land" in Seaham, Wallalong and Brandy Hill is shifted into the Maitland Council area.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
$0/
(min cost $0)
or signup to continue reading
The recommendation to move the Port boundary and transfer land west of the Williams River to an amalgamated Maitland-Dungog council was aired late last week in the final report of an independent review into local councils.
But the suggestion has sparked strong opposition from Port Mayor Bruce MacKenzie, who this week said the changes would happen "over my dead body".
"In two decades that land will be prime residential land for development," he said.
"It would be untold millions in rates, developer contributions and future development.
"And it would be 15 years at least before the council will have to spend a cracker."
Mr MacKenzie said Maitland Council had been "blessed" with residential land prime for development, and said Port Stephens' supply was limited because of National Parks, aircraft noise, flood and bushfire risk.
"The land west of the river is high and dry - it's ideal," he said.
Local Government minister Don Page said while there would be no forced amalgamations of councils, change needed to occur.
"The government wants to get on with reform and prepare a response to these two important reports," he said.
But Mr MacKenzie suggested that the state government concentrate its efforts in Sydney, where he claimed a larger portion of councils were dysfunctional.
"Don't worry about Port Stephens, we're financially sound and we're travelling well," he said.
"Keep your hands off it."
The report will remain on public exhibition until March 7 for residents to comment.
Those wanting to read the report can view it online at localgovernmentreview.nsw.gov.au/.